Which result is NOT a primary goal of notice-and-comment rulemaking?

Which result is NOT a primary goal of notice-and-comment rulemaking?

• A. Efficient speed in rule adoption.
• B. Transparency.
• C. Legitimacy.
• D. Public participation.

Answer: (A)

The process is built to involve stakeholders and justify regulatory choices in an open, accountable way. Its main aims are transparency, public participation, and legitimacy. Publishing notices and proposed rules allows anyone to see what’s being considered (transparency). Opening a comment period invites input from affected parties and others who care about the policy (public participation). Responding to those comments and providing a clear rationale for the final rule helps demonstrate that the agency’s decision has been thoughtfully considered and supported (legitimacy). Efficient speed in rule adoption is not a primary goal. The notice-and-comment framework accepts that deliberation and input time can slow the process, because the emphasis is on careful consideration and accountability rather than speed.

The process is built to involve stakeholders and justify regulatory choices in an open, accountable way. Its main aims are transparency, public participation, and legitimacy. Publishing notices and proposed rules allows anyone to see what’s being considered (transparency). Opening a comment period invites input from affected parties and others who care about the policy (public participation). Responding to those comments and providing a clear rationale for the final rule helps demonstrate that the agency’s decision has been thoughtfully considered and supported (legitimacy).

Efficient speed in rule adoption is not a primary goal. The notice-and-comment framework accepts that deliberation and input time can slow the process, because the emphasis is on careful consideration and accountability rather than speed.