Which is an example of less lethal force?

Which is an example of less lethal force?

• A. Using handcuffs to restrain a non-compliant person
• B. Firing a firearm
• C. Using pepper spray
• D. Deploying a stun grenade

Answer: (A)

Less-lethal force aims to subdue or control a person with minimal risk of causing fatal harm. Using handcuffs to restrain a non-compliant person fits this well because it directly limits movement and safety risk without inflicting injury or lasting harm. It accomplishes control through restraint rather than forceful impact, making it the most appropriate example among the options. In contrast, firing a firearm is intended to stop a threat with a real risk of fatal injury. Pepper spray can incapacitate and cause distress, which, while often labeled less-lethal, still involves force with potential injuries. A stun grenade disrupts and can cause injuries as well, representing a higher level of disruption and risk than simple restraint.

Less-lethal force aims to subdue or control a person with minimal risk of causing fatal harm. Using handcuffs to restrain a non-compliant person fits this well because it directly limits movement and safety risk without inflicting injury or lasting harm. It accomplishes control through restraint rather than forceful impact, making it the most appropriate example among the options.

In contrast, firing a firearm is intended to stop a threat with a real risk of fatal injury. Pepper spray can incapacitate and cause distress, which, while often labeled less-lethal, still involves force with potential injuries. A stun grenade disrupts and can cause injuries as well, representing a higher level of disruption and risk than simple restraint.